You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Just because we do not have the necessary tools to fully comprehend and understand the universe, does not mean it must have been created by a higher power. As our knowledge expands, our doubts and beliefs lessen.
Then a creator of the creator must exist. And a creator of the creator's creator.
Is it turtles all the way down?
There is no reason to believe a creator must exist when we can describe the universe as it is without adding a creator. The universe works just fine without an appeal to belief.
When we use the concept of a creator to fill in the gaps that science has not yet filled, we diminish science, and we diminish the creator.
The idea that 'everything is created' is illogical, given that creator of everything must be created. Sone things just are. I choose the universe over some deity as what I believe just was, given I can prove the existence of the Universe.
You never specified what the creator was or what they created. I am an artist, I create art, I believe I exist, therefore your arguement is true
what is the definition of "creator"? As in a god? Or just someone who makes something.
it doesnt imply it still is...
Sentience has created free will and thus ,with the knowledge of what is right or wrong ,we have no need for religion which is a human construct
false assumption that there must be A creator and not many many creators
creator of what?
can is more suitable instead of must
exist" as a separate entity from our reality or a part of it; if separate, it escapes all the logic; if a part than it implies incomplete creator creates a part of itself
"Must" implies a lack of evidence, therefore it's an unreasonable assumption. One could just as easily say "Due to lack of proof, there "must" not be a creator". Both sides are weak. The question remains open, though good reasoning skills require us to err on the side of absence until we have proof.
There is a reason for the rise of atheism with high education. We are in a giant universe that does work in accordance with human's evolutionary way of thinking. Concepts like a mover moves and a creater creates are only human perception. The universe doesn't assign functions to things.
There must be some kind of first principle underlying reality. Were there to be no first principle, then there would be a nonsensical and never ending chain of causes into eternity. The only way to remedy this is to posit a first cause.
We observe the universe as being imperfect, and that we cannot make something that can surpass the rules we impose on it. Therefore the universe needed to be created by entity which isn't confined in rules in which we are confined.
existence requires identity, identity requires distinguishing characteristics, characteristics must be observable to be distinguishing.
as an action is not possible without a actor, creation is not possible without a creator. Since we know there is a creation, there must be a creator.
I created this post.
At least one creator exists in this point of time.
God is perfect. There cannot be something that is perfect and does not exist, so God must exist.
Something cannot come into being out of nothing.
There cannot be something from nothing.