You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
A vote still represents minorities needs. Instead of only catering to the majority vote, all votes could be catered to with the majority getting the highest priority.
Majority Rule = Minorities whose needs do not get met.
No. The matter is way more complex. What are we talking about here? Economics? Yes, as the majority of people are proletarians, their interests will be defended more in a really democratic governance. Social? Not really, different from class, social, cultural differences are not mutually exclusive.
Why should one group of people have the right to impose their will on other people who do not consent?
Coalitions of different minority groups that generally agree can still come together and have a profound impact.
Dictators also suppress minorities. Unless you aren't suggesting this is inherent to democracies?
So? The premise implies that this is a negative thing. So I have to ask, is there any other form that would prevent that?