arguman.org is an argument analysis platform.

Governments are criminal organizations

Governments use force to keep out competitors.

Irrelevant Conclusion

How exactly does this make gov't a criminal organization?
zmt

You can prevent three people from dying if you kill one yourself. This would be the morally correct choice to make

You won't. Source: You can save probably more than 100 lives in Africa right now by selling all of your possessions and donating it all.

Argument Against TheMan

just because he does not do X he can find think X is moral

It is impossible to prove if God exists.

If you commit suicide just to see if you end up in Heaven, you can't come back to tell the tale.

Appeal To Belief

it is your belief that you can't come back from heaven

My Logical Map

The title is Chinese and the rest is English...?

Wrong Direction

The title is English and the premises are Chinese.

Censorship online is equivalent to censorship in real life, and is ethically wrong in any form

"To claim otherwise shows complete ignorance on the subject." This is a useless addition. Debates can be frustrating, but these kind of sentences will only raise the general frustration level.

Irrelevant Conclusion

This would make a better fallacy report than actual argument.
afx

It is best to not enforce an 80 column width limit in Python

they may do it anyway

Irrelevant Conclusion

I've clarified the wording of the parent premise to say 'Inexperienced or unfocused developers will *have way more opportunities to* not break lines nicely', so this is now irrelevant.

It is best to not enforce an 80 column width limit in Python

no project is "well architected"

Fallacy Of Red Herring

The argument was that 'the benefit of two files side-by-side is overstated'. This doesn't go against that argument and is therefore irrelevant. The easiest way to get past this is to read the parent premise's context as 'the better architected the project is, the less you need to view two files side-by-side.'

The chicken came before the egg

Only God knows, because he created everything living.

Irrelevant Conclusion

This premise has approximately nothing to do with the subject

You can prevent three people from dying if you kill one yourself. This would be the morally correct choice to make

If you don't do it, it's not really your fault, nobody has to know about the deal, and if you kill someone its on you and they will probably ignore the 3 people and arrest you for the 1 because our court system is flawed in such a way that allows this to happen.

Fallacy Of Red Herring

Legal repercussions don't have bearing on the morality of your action

You can prevent three people from dying if you kill one yourself. This would be the morally correct choice to make

What if it were 3 Hitlers that you could save?

Fallacy Of Red Herring

This is a more fundamental argument and assumes we know nothing about the person