arguman.org is an argument analysis platform.

Market Capitalism is not the best system for economic organisation

Gus disagrees

Wrong Direction

Gus has an opinion and opinions are not true all the time. Furthermore nobody knows who Gus is.

Market Capitalism is not the best system for economic organisation

Gus disagrees

Appeal To Authority

Not even sure who Gus is to be honest

You should try LSD at least once

Regardless, if you do try it, you should first invest in a quality sound system.

Irrelevant Conclusion

Does not move argument forward. You could just as easily say, "You should wear a tutu".

You should try LSD at least once

It connects areas of your brain that have never connected before. Maybe your geometric recognition connects with your creativity and you become aware of realities that you once never knew. As a great psychonaut once said; "Acid opens up doors, but once they're open, you can't close them".

Appeal To Authority

There is no basis given for the statement, "It connects areas of your brain".

Arguing whether God exists or not is useless to everyone.

Not necessarily. What if you have a discussion with your religious friend, and convince him God isn't real? You have just saved him/her a great deal of time and money.

Begging The Question

It assumes God isn't real, when the question is about how arguing whether God exists or not is useful or useless.

Critical thinking and basic situational analysis skills should be taught in schools.

Appeal To Belief

No reason provided, making the only validation a pre-existing belief

You should try LSD at least once

argument: you should eat a spoon full of cow shit at least once A: some people prefere to eat food that does not contain shit B: this is an unachivable goal. every farmer puts cow shit on the field to let the plants grow faster and every time you eat that you also eat some shit

Fallacy Of Red Herring

Strawman fallacy. Taking LSD is, obviously, not really analogous to eating cow shit.
afx

Western democracy is fundamentally twisted in favor of the interests of the wealthy.

Politicians are financially incentivized to prioritize the interests of the wealthy. The wealthy can donate heavily to politicians that serve their interests. The middle class and the poor cannot donate on that scale, and thus it is less lucrative for politicians to attempt to serve their interests.

Wrong Direction

Wealthy can donate heavily to politicians that serve their interests so politicians are financially incentivized to prioritize the interests of the wealthy.

Abortion is a socially accepted kill

It is easier to call it Abortion than Murder to deal with psychological trauma

Irrelevant Conclusion

This does not support the argument and has little to do with the discussion.
afx