You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
This is entirely dependant on what the world order's goals and objectives are. A world order that wants to kill everyone is not exactly beneficial.
A world order that promoted worldwide/universal togetherness could be nothing but beneficial for all of humanity, but one that encouraged slaughter and total anarchy would be destructive.
Only two possible outcomes? How about a decentralized "world order" where people could decide how they organize matters in their living environment(s)? Besides, anarchy means nothing but non-existence of power hiearchy and centralized control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy astikain
Slaughter requires the antithesis of anarchy, which is autocracy.
Beneficial for who? It's unlikely that it would be beneficial for all segments of society.
...disorderly people would be silenced?
Because everyone would live under the same laws it wouldn't be possible for one country to exploit another.
Who makes the laws? Who decides who the law-makers get to be?
People living in a country exploit each other.
Jeremiah 10:23 says human governments cannot rule the world. Daniel 2:44 says God will bring out just one government that will be successful indefinitely.
How can you demonstrate that the Bible is a reliable source?