←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
An odd-even release cycle with alternative releases focussing only on bug fixes is a better idea
because
score: 4
We are in dire need of cleanup time.
because
score: 1
Doing bugfixes and maintenance is less sexy in comparison to implementing new features and nobody wants to do it.
0 branch
‒
however
score: 1
we could do longer RCs or so
however
score: 1
We have some serious catching up to do. We ignored the housekeeping part for the last time.
0 branch
‒
because
score: 1
We'd have a reliable stable release (at least more stable than the other one).
however
score: 1
We can guarantee stability have having a well tested Release candidate instead of the long wait
0 branch
‒
however
score: 1
A lot of bugfixes end up becoming features. Proper classification might be a problem. We could have number of bugfix issue goals for each release. The maintainers can be asked to pick 5 each and work on them before the next release. If this is about cleanup we can tackle it statistically.
but
score: 1
"'do only bugfixes or your change will be in the merge queue for a month' does not lead to very fun work" -- underyx
4 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
fneu
(2 years, 3 months ago)
adtac
