←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
argüman is a cool platforme
however
score: 15
The interface can be confusing.
because
score: 4
It sharpens our critical thinking
however
score: 3
A definition of the fallacies could be a good thing.
but
score: 2
it should replace the "however" with "note that" and allow to choose "question" to ask for more details.
because
score: 2
It has the potential to evolve and become better
sources:
Update of the 18th october in which the staff seemed to hear users' will
1 supporter.
however
score: 2
It should have a button to save favorite arguments
however
score: 2
There should be a system to measure user accuracy on reporting fallacies. Today anyone can report fallacies and many times these reports can be/are wrong.
but
score: 1
it should allow the participants to have a private discussion
because
score: 1
Argumen could eventually make a lot of money from product reviews with reasons to agree and disagree that a product is the best within its market.
but
score: 1
That is an opinion which can not be proven with incontravertable proof or disproven with evidence to the contrary.
however
score: 1
It should create a "define" button because a lot of disagreement would be resolved if all the participants knew precisely about what they talk about
sources:
e.g god, freedom, moral, lying ect encompass different definitions which blurs the the argument
because
score: 1
We can share our ideas and develop our own ideas. Also, it pushes us to think critically.
because
score: 1
It is visually appealing
however
score: 1
It needs Ajax so the page doesn’t have to keep loading...
because
score: 0
It has a really simple interface easily understandable
but
score: -5
it should create a way to delete the content which is reported for fallacy by a certain amount of people
15 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
tomink
(2 years ago)
dobby
