Unlike videotape that had to be viewed strictly sequentially, a video can be viewed from any random point. So if the relevant clip is pointed out, we can skip the rest easily.
Providing a video proof engages the opponent. It does not attack him personally (=telling him to f*** o**)
[I repeated this as a "But" node, to show how it compares with a fallacy. Now this node can be opposed, but not the fallacy. Also, the fallacy leaves no trace of the sender.]
i just watched a video that explained undebatable why you are wrong only with sounds a visuals. i would put the link in the source but i don't want to be rude towards you.