a
/Meta
sender
ccorcos
source
Arguman.com
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Arguman
will fail miserably
however
score: 1
what does fail mean in this context?
when no one uses the side anymore?
when the side is taken down?
...?
sender:
kataquax
3 years, 8 months ago
permalink
because
score: 0
I commend the effort and think this is awesome. But arguments degrade quickly. Arguman doesn't necessarily seem to encourage healthy discourse, let alone prevent Godwin's Law.
sender:
ccorcos
3 years, 8 months ago
permalink
but
score: 1
the branching and the option to report fallacies do prevent Godwin's Law
sender:
kataquax
3 years, 8 months ago
permalink
0 branch
‒
1 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
%100 support rate
last update:
kataquax
(3 years, 8 months ago)
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Arguman
is a Website
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
Argüman has too few fallacies to pick from
Arguman does not measure objection rate correctly because a but to a but is not an objection to the original argument.
Arguman's character limit for a premise is good for discourse
Arguman should notify you whenever someone responds to one of your premises.
Arguman should be used in our SW company to reason about complex topics
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
Website
is a Computer
The Science Section of this Website is Pointless
All these arguments on the website are absolute.
The Terms of Service of this website should be translated into english
This website could use some extra features
This website sucks.
Some premises on this website are not seriously written.
Is it our obligation to implement good practices and make web sites accessible?