a
/Meta
sender
ccorcos
source
Arguman.com
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Arguman
will fail miserably
however
score: 1
what does fail mean in this context?
when no one uses the side anymore?
when the side is taken down?
...?
sender:
kataquax
1 year, 9 months ago
permalink
because
score: 0
I commend the effort and think this is awesome. But arguments degrade quickly. Arguman doesn't necessarily seem to encourage healthy discourse, let alone prevent Godwin's Law.
sender:
ccorcos
1 year, 9 months ago
permalink
but
score: 1
the branching and the option to report fallacies do prevent Godwin's Law
sender:
kataquax
1 year, 9 months ago
permalink
0 branch
‒
1 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
%100 support rate
last update:
kataquax
(1 year, 9 months ago)
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Arguman
is a Website
Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink
It's not clear how to organize premises in Arguman
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
Argüman has too few fallacies to pick from
arguman > r/changemyview
Arguman should add either review fallacy reports or allow them to be overturned.
Arguman should notify you whenever someone responds to one of your premises.
Website
is a Computer
Some premises on this website are not seriously written.
Accounts that frequently commit logic fallacies should be banned from posting on this website
Websites should post their password requirements on their login pages so we can remember, what we needed to do to a normal password to make it work on their site
This website might be better off as its own subreddit on reddit.com.
This website could use some extra features
This website needs a way to support someone who says "Hey, there's a fallacy here!", and a way to say "There's a fallacy here because..."
Is it our obligation to implement good practices and make web sites accessible?