←
↑ ↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
however
score: 5
People often equate editorial discretion in private mediums as censorship akin to that found in totalitarian dictatorships. There is a difference.
because
score: 5
People cannot be free to make good choices if they are prevented from knowing all their options. (By the same token, scamming, lying, etc are immoral.)
but
score: 2
but not in all cases if A tries to convince B with a text to do something immoral (like killing C). It would be moral to censore this text so B doesn't do the immoral act
because
score: 1
it goes against freedom of speech and it stops people from being able to judge and make their own decisions about things and it can alienate people by hiding anyone who shares a similar view to them all these things are abuse of a person, so it is immoral
because
score: 1
Anything that can be censored can be considered art, art is free expression and it is wrong to censor free expression.
but
score: 1
Censorship is occasionally required to prevent mass hysteria
5 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
zmt
(5 years ago)