Sorry, but what does it mean to "contemplate", and "having enough time" for a merely computing agent? What is this agent going to contemplate about (compute if you like) all that "time"? :D
Consciousness cannot be reduced to computing, to mathematical calculations and such, computers will never contemplate or question anything, unless programmed by a conscious being to do so. Because a computer can't evolve itself, it must be created by a conscious being.
sources:
So your modernist-fetishism either ends up in religiousness (Which ends up being correct, this "physicism" or "technologicism" is a religion) or it doesn't "contemplate itself" and remains as mysticism.
We have no proof consciousness is entirely based on a material mecanism. Since we haven't solved the mind-body problem, we can't affirm that kind of statement.
There's also no evidence to show that it *isn't* a physical process. The burden of proof falls on those who claim an external mind/soul exists. Burden of proof is on the *positive claim*.
The mind-body problem is solved, there is no problem: Dont skip drinking and eating for long, or you will have nomind. Or, consciousness is based on material relations (mechanism s too cognitive), yet those relations are morethan dynamic and complex. Batter ways to counter mechanists than metaphysik
This proof fetishism tastes like burned pumpkin. What proof do you need? We know a great deal about the emergent qualities of mind, and that it can only emerge from a body. Mind is nothing but a capacity of bodies. There are bodies, ideas strolling around, and some obsessed with boring dualities.
alex
