a
sender
quarkeey
source
This site
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Every
argument
boils down to
pedantic
definitions
.
The argument have no premises.
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Statement
is a Message
If you want to base your decision on faith. You can't try support it with rational arguments.
"Argument" should be translated as "论点"
This argument thread will have the most argument replies and will be on the ''the most crowded argument'' of this week
a Nietzchean "will to power" argument can be put forward to explain Freudian "will to pleasure"
All disagreements come from poorly formed arguments
This is an argument
Your argument is invalid
Definition
is an Explanation
Curly brackets should be used in the same line as function definition and not in new line.
If I use Typescript in a project with a lot of dependencies.. I have to write type definitions for all of these (if not present on TSD).
Define Racism objectively without being Racist by your own definition
Having different interpretations of any definition fails our collective knowledge.
Definitions are best kept 'loose'/open in discussions
There should be inbuilt definitions for logical fallacies in arguman
There are two conflicting definitions of marriage, one used by the State and another used by religious orginizations.
Argument
is an Evidence
Curly brackets should be used in the same line as function definition and not in new line.
This statement is false.
Darren can win an argument against himself
When starting a new argument on argüman for which you have a already a partial opinion, you should instead state the opposite of your proposal.
In Argüman, any 'however' statement could also be a 'but' statement.
Your argument is invalid
a Nietzchean "will to power" argument can be put forward to explain Freudian "will to pleasure"
Academic
is an Educator
Law enforcement training standards are not comprehensive enough, and should entail more stringent academic requirements.
Discussion
is a Speech
Definitions are best kept 'loose'/open in discussions
The more Argüman users are attached to the idea of "being right" more so than to the idea of engaging in rational discourse with an open mind, the less enjoyable this site becomes.
Lucifer Leaders is receiving unfair treatments from PTS staff members
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
We are witch hunters not nazis with regards to our treatment of animals
argüman should provide a chat or another mean of discussion in order to avoid it in the tree of premises.
It's okay to guess or 'brute force' in Words With Friends
quarkeey
quarkeey