←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Erotic fictional depictions (ex drawings, stories) of abusive sexual content (ex rape, incest, pedophilia) should be banned
but
score: 2
Because the depictions are fictional, no people are actually being abused, so people should be free to enjoy them.
because
score: 1
The depictions will normalize the abusive behavior and increase its prevalence in the general population
1 fallacy reported.
Fallacy Of False Cause
By the same token, we should ban all violence in movies and literature.
gnudiff
1 supporter.
however
score: 4
Empirical evidences would be good.
because
score: 2
It could also help people to deal with their desires by relieving them in fictional context, and then it could go in the opposite direction.
0 branch
‒
however
score: 1
If it is true, we should think about it for all violence depictions, and not only sexual violence depictions.
1 branch
‒
but
score: 1
Abuse victims may use these depictions as coping mechanisms, and so we should not deny these people a way of easing their trauma.
but
score: 1
Only abuse victims may generate and view depictions of abusive sexual content
because
score: 1
The only legitimate purpose of depicting abusive sexual content is to prevent further abuse or to alleviate the trauma of an already-abused person.
but
score: 0
People do not control what they are sexually attracted to
but
score: 1
The environment influences what people are sexually attracted to. An increased prevalence of fictional abusive sexual content will influence people who would not otherwise be inclined to abuse.
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
but
score: 1
It is abusive to force people to reveal whether or not they were abused to check whether they are obeying the rule.
1 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
2 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
hyphae
(5 years ago)
hyphae
