Future bathroom designs should have no dividers between female stalls
but
score: 9
There is no evidence to show a benefit by exclusion of dividers. Dividers provide privacy for oneself and a barrier from others. Thus, the proposal is unnecessary and reasonably undesirable.
There is less chance of the Sexual Assault going unnoticed. The assailant can't be in the stall with her without anyone knowing. If the bathroom was empty it wouldn't matter anyway.
Male bathrooms also feature stalls that are used for both, urination and defecation. If the dividers between stalls in female bathrooms should be removed, dividers in male bathrooms would have to be removed as well. The only way to egalize bathrooms would be non-devided female urinals
This is a both an Appeal to Equality fallacy and an Assumed Intent fallacy. The stated argument makes no mention of egalitarian goals, nor aligning the common features between male and female public restrooms.
The majority of men are attracted to women and not other men so other men's genitals are not viewed in a sexual context as they would be by a homosexual man
lifeinthefastlane
