←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Is a sign promoting drug use under the protection of the First Amendment?
-
because
score: 1
The State governments spend billions of dollars in education about the warnings of drug use.
-
but
score: 1
Parents decide to send their children to public school
-
however
score: 1
Not everyone has the privilege to pay for private schooling
- 0 branch
- ‒
-
because
score: 1
Allowing free speech to promote drug use is counterproductive
- 1 branch
- ‒
-
because
score: 1
This banner that Fredrick displayed was for humor and fame only.
-
but
score: 1
Student expression can't be suppressed unless school officials
-
because
score: 0
Vernonia School Dist. 47J v. Acton
(1995)
-
because
score: -1
In Bethel School District No. 403 v. Fraser
-
but
score: 2
Virginia v. Black (2003)
-
because
score: 1
Student expression may not
be suppressed unless school officials reasonably conclude that it will disrupt the work and discipline of school.
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 0 branch
- ‒
-
because
score: 1
Tinker [v. Des Moines Independent Community School District, 1969]
- 1 branch
- ‒
-
because
score: 0
Many students could interpret this form of free speech on school grounds as promoting drug use.
-
but
score: 1
students speech disrupts the educational, learning process.
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 2 branch
- ‒
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
olsonjay
olsonjay
