←
↑ ↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Jimmy Kimmel should not bring up inaction on gun policy (now)
because
score: 1
Kimmel's "schtick" was entirely based on emotion.
because
score: 1
Kimmel's approach divides the country. (The country is not unified because of stuff like this.)
but
score: 1
No one could ever have expected that something terrible would happen, but it did.
because
score: 1
Kimmel is lying ("this is lie number eight in this little monologue", "time for a few more falsehoods from Jimmy Kimmel").
but
score: 1
He is an american and has every right to do so.
but
score: 1
That is the argument that is always being made by opponents of gun regulations. Either nothing has happened in so long so there is no need for it, or we are too close to the last major shooting so its too soon. The solution is instead of waiting for the right time, we have just decided now is.
because
score: 0
Kimmel's "schtick" was really nasty.
because
score: 0
Kimmel has become sort of the ... all heart ... representative of all leftist causes.
because
score: 0
Kimmel [just] goes off.
because
score: 0
Kimmel is ignorant.
sources:
Shapiro
1 fallacy reported.
Argument Against TheMan
It is not about Kimmel but about gun policy
noname
because
score: -6
Last night House press secretary Sarah Sander said, this is not the time, or actually this was today, this morning said it was not the time for political debate.
sources:
Sarah Sander (according to Kimmel)
10 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.