111

Tater tots have more surface area

It is possible for said war veterans to be fighting for a bad cause, which would arguably make them villains since they're willing to risk their life for said bad cause.

Being progressive has nothing to do with being secular, so a country could be religious but still secular.

This is entirely subjective and people will have different opinions, therefore neither box or homemade mac and cheese is better.

associated with another argument
Ethics man did what had to be done

This is only true when applying LEM, especially in classical logic. And we can't expect "everything" to be studied only by classical logicians.

Even if every-"things" are objects, Einstein showed us we can't say much about every object in the universe, especially those which are outside our light-cone. Thus "everything in the universe" probably denotes pretty abstract things, even physically.

In the original statement, we may want to consider "everything" to be actual objects. Non-classical logic (like in constructionism) is powerful (and useful) to reason about abstract constructions: logic, maths, computing... When dealing with actual objects we can feel, classical logic looks good.

This argument is precisely the law of the excluded middle. It is used in classical logic but is not absolute (like anything in logic maybe). Simplest example: liar paradox. We can't expect all users of logic to follow classical logic.