←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Nothing that all participants freely consented to is immoral .
however
score: 14
What "freely consented" mean ?
however
score: 12
Only if the invested parties are both standing on equal footing in terms of power with regard to the agreement/action.
however
score: 2
This statement assumes that objection to personal preference is the sole proprietor of what constitutes morality
but
score: 2
People who don't participate in an action might still be affected by it. How an action affects people, or how it *might* affect people, has some bearing on the rightness or wrongness of that action.
but
score: 2
What if the bad influences of participants actions are on the environment, or on cultural heritage for example?
because
score: 1
Consent is one of the primary markers of justice in human encounters.
however
score: 1
Given that the consent was informed- i.e. all consequences clearly outlined, no misleading information
but
score: -2
Unless it's a group of people agreeing to do something that will have a negative affect on others
but
score: -4
If I take a photograph of a crowd, and I didn't ask all human subjects if I could take their picture, is that immoral?
8 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
serecip
(4 years, 6 months ago)
evenstar
