←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Presidential Immunity doesn't protect against prior civil litigation
-
because
score: 2
Immunity doesn't apply to unofficial business
-
because
score: 1
"Entitled to absolute immunity from damages liability predicated on his official acts."
sources:
Nixon v. Fitzgerald (1982)
- 0 branch
- ‒
-
because
score: 0
Separation of powers isn't infringed by allowing previous civil suits against a current president to happen.
-
but
score: 1
The separation of powers would be violated allowing the action to proceed.
sources:
Epstein & Walker (pg. 152)
-
however
score: 2
The course of the lines between powers of the three branches isn't clearly defined
sources:
Epstein & Walker (pg. 152)
-
because
score: 1
The civil suit doesn't interfere with official conduct between the branches the judicial powers are allowed to review legality of the case.
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 0 branch
- ‒
- 1 branch
- ‒
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
nauta23
nauta23
