Programming language popularity is a major factor in deciding whether or not to use it in a project.

because

score: 12

A more popular language will have a larger community and more community support, which results in more third party libraries or modules and more programmers to hire.

sender:
zmt

5 years, 2 months ago

10 supporters.

 permalink
- but
  
  score: 0
  
  Larger number of people knowing programming language does not mean better community. For example, compare PHP and Ruby (this applies to good quality libraries too).
  
  sender:
  ungzd
  
  4 years, 8 months ago
  
  1 fallacy reported.
  Irrelevant Conclusion
  
  The previous poster did not say the community was "Better", only "Larger" believerinmagnets
  
   permalink
- 0 branch
- ‒
however

score: 7

More than one language can be used in a project.

sender:
pczarn

5 years ago

4 supporters.

 permalink
- because
  
  score: 2
  
  This also opens the possibility for multiple *implementations* of the same project.
  
  sender:
  gappleto97
  
  4 years, 9 months ago
  
  1 supporter.
  
   permalink
- 0 branch
- ‒
because

score: 4

Popularity increases the gene pool of possible contributors.

sender:
will

5 years, 2 months ago

2 supporters.

 permalink
- however
  
  score: 0
  
  In open-source projects, you'll get more contributions if project is in less painful language. Most popular languages are quite painful.
  
  sender:
  ungzd
  
  4 years, 8 months ago
  
  1 fallacy reported.
  Irrelevant Conclusion
  
  It is questionable whether most popular languages are painful. even if they were, by definition those being popular languages have enough programmers to support the project. engineerwolf
  
   permalink
- however
  
  score: 0
  
  Most skilled developers can learn new programming languages easily.
  
  sender:
  ungzd
  
  4 years, 8 months ago
  
  1 fallacy reported.
  Wrong Direction
  
  developer's ability to learn programming language does not affect the available gene pool of contributors. engineerwolf
  
   permalink
- 1 branch
- ‒
because

score: -6

Popularity means it has been proven work.

sender:
mydmdm

5 years, 2 months ago

2 fallacies reported.
Irrelevant Conclusion

... nfedyashev

Fallacy Of False Cause

This is just not true. relrod6

 permalink
- but
  
  score: 3
  
  New languages often become suddenly popular before they're proven in the real world, only for people to switch back again.
  
  sender:
  phonicuk
  
  4 years, 9 months ago
  
  2 supporters.
  
   permalink
- but
  
  score: 2
  
  Popularity can also arise when there is no other viable language exists for given purpose.
  
  sender:
  senokay
  
  4 years, 9 months ago
  
  1 supporter.
  
   permalink
- however
  
  score: 1
  
  It's not necessary should be the most popular. Popularity just should cross some threshold to signal that it works.
  
  sender:
  ungzd
  
  4 years, 8 months ago
  
  1 fallacy reported.
  Irrelevant Conclusion
  
  The premise seems to lead to a conclusion about how popular something needs to be to be viable not that popularity is good nobin
  
   permalink
- but
  
  score: 1
  
  no. It doesn't.
  
  sender:
  relrod6
  
  4 years, 8 months ago
  
   permalink
- 3 branch
- ‒
3 branch
‒

sender

source

view

Programming language popularity is a major factor in deciding whether or not to use it in a project.

Computer Science is an Engineering

Word is a Language Unit

Monolith is a Stone

Language is a Communication

Programming is a Monolith