←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Research on geo-engineering should be support ed financially, globally, and the UN may be the best for doing it
because
score: 6
|f we are forced to choose, we should choose geo-engineering. For this choice or option to be available, we need to start doing research already.
because
score: 5
Geo-engineering is less bad than catastrophic impacts of climate destabilization and the like.
because
score: 4
If very substantial progress on missions reduction is not made soon, then at some point we may end up facing a choice between allowing catastrophic impacts to occur, or engaging in geo-engineering.
because
score: 3
There is little reason to think that the world governments and the wealthy will change the trend in carbon emissions in the near future.
because
score: 2
Carbon emissions are increasing, and are projected to increase for years yet. In the last years there has been very little progress on reducing carbon emissions.
because
score: 1
In whatever intricate ways, carbon emissions cause the warming of the atmosphere.
but
score: 0
Reducing global emissions is by far the best way to address climate change.
but
score: 1
But this also assumes a certain degree of control over the climate by "engineering" the human practices.
0 branch
‒
1 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
totstaki
(4 years, 12 months ago)
totstaki
