If something cannot be proven, cannot make predictions of any sort, cannot be observed, and cannot be disproven, odds are it's incorrect. Therefor it should not be taught over something which *can* be proven, *can* make predictions, *can* be observed, and can *potentially* be disproven.
watch spiderman free online 2006 at 9movies.be Science Religion Evolution Technology Better Than Space Politics Philosophy Life Art Death Society Drugs Games Programming Movies Aliens Gender Universe Meta Socialism Economy Animals People
Creationism is a part of christianity. As it sits, religion should not be thought of as "fact", but only as a belief. As such, evolution has far surpassed being simply "belief". If creationism is to be taught alongside evolution, then all other religious creationist beliefs should be taught as well.
Teaching creationism is bad science. Standard creationist claims about the age of the Earth, the pattern of descent of living creatures, and human history are contradicted by scientific evidence, and were rejected by mainstream science over a century ago. Teaching this would be misinforming students
This is a personal opinion/belief, not an argument, and is a rebuttal to specific beliefs, not the main topic of discussion. Also, no sources for information are included. Therefore, it has no place here.
Churches, mosques and other religious institutions should be required to present (and praise and preach:)) evolution, fossil record, deep time, relativity, etc.. since neither story is superior to the other.