←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Sherbert’s Ability to Freely Practice Her Faith Was Hindered by the State’s Restrictions For Unemployment Compensation.
because
score: 2
The disqualifications for benefits impose burdens on the free exercise of Sherbert's religion.
because
score: 1
If the purpose for a law is to discriminate between religions, then the law is constitutionally invalid even though the burden may be indirect.
however
score: 1
This does not violates the Establishment Clause due to the Seventh-day Adventist Church
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
but
score: 1
The issue is not individual action, it is South Carolina's denial of unemployment on the basis of her beliefs.
but
score: 1
The Free Exercise Clause protection of Sherbert's actions and the Establishment Clause prohibits this protection.
but
score: 1
The Commission denied Shertbert unemployment benefits because she was not "available to work" due to a private decision she made.
however
score: 1
The Free Exercise Clause only requires neutrality toward religion, which would not include exempting Sherbert, even though the Constitution would allow a legislature to create this exemption.
0 branch
‒
because
score: 1
Sherbert's ability to freely exercise her faith was hindered by the state's restrictions for unemployment compensation.
4 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
madimeyers
