arguman.org is an argument analysis platform.

Statistics

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

because
3.案父注意到個案在家有間續的煩躁、自語、多疑及聽幻覺。個案想去男友家,但案父阻止時,個案出現肢體攻擊案父的頭與腳的行為。案父求救警察,在警察到達後個案也搧了警察巴掌。因此個案有自傷傷人之虞。可以強制住院治療,醫療團隊也可以決定跟案父討論,限制讓個案情緒欠穩的男友前來訪視。
7 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

because
1.個案有思考型障礙,判斷力差。據案父描述,個案與現任男友的關係非常複雜,案男友會跟個案拿錢,並要求個案去酒店工作賺更多錢。以及個案住院期間案男友不斷電話威脅社工人員,對護理人員態度不友善,所以案男友與個案繼續活動,會危害個案身心健康,與疾病治療。
7 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
There are so many chats and it is hard to keep an overview
6 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
There is no option of Threads which leads to huge amounts of messages
6 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

because
4.醫院有保護病人的義務,對於有影響病人治療情況的訪客,醫院有拒絕探視的權利。且直系親屬才能訪客。如:祖父母、父母、配偶,因病情需要時,則依醫囑禁止會客,如有特殊情況,需事先告知。
6 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

because
2. 個案與案男友同居將近1個月,由於個案經常與案男友吵架,所以被案男友帶回家。所以案男友是會讓個案情緒更不穩定的因素,所以應該要限制案男友訪視。
6 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
No other international movement/NGO/protest group only uses telegram.
5 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Appeal To Authority

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
It seperated space for actually doing work and for discussions and information sharing
5 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
Discord or others platforms are also easy to use
5 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
It isn't robust for organising on because it's such a small space
4 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

but
Doing this to every chat is a difficult task for many people.
4 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
個案和男友經常吵架,為導致病情加重的因素之一,且男友會跟個案拿錢,然後叫她去酒店賺更多錢,這是心理及社會支持?
4 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
個案因思考障礙,判斷力差,並且現在為急性期現實感差,因此容易做出衝動性的決策,所以當下個案自主性暫時不能為主要考量。
4 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
Static typing serves as reliable documentation.
24 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
Static typing allows compilers to optimize in a way that is hardly achievable with dynamic typed languages
28 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
It is not very effective to use
3 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
Its impossible to pin messages or share information for everyone to see without them also being discussion spaces.
3 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

but
Deciding on one an international chatting platform will most likely not work, as different working groups need to be able to remain autonomous/flexible and choose the platform that makes the most sense for the task of the group.
3 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

but
Telegram is very easy to use
3 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
必要時可以,但是案父是直系血親,所以可以透過醫療團隊聯繫關心個案病況,等病情穩定再安排探視。
3 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

because
5.因為醫療團隊才真正了解病人目前的病情狀況及真正知道應該如何做才是真正能協助到病人早日回到家中或是社區中生活
3 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
但現在個案是處在一個不穩定的狀態,案父注意到她有間續的煩躁、自語、多疑及聽幻覺。然而她爸爸阻止她去男友家,她就打她爸爸的頭及踢他的腳。她爸爸求救警察,在警察到達後她也搧了警察巴掌。可見現在個案的狀態其實是不適合見客的,如果堅持讓個案會客,一旦談及的話題使個案情緒激動或是生氣,也許受傷的不單單只是護理人員,也會波及到來會客的人。
3 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
It is easier to detect and fix compile-time errors than runtime errors.
18 supporter.

Tabs are better than spaces for indentation (programming)

however
You can configure your IDE to convert tab to spaces automagically, which means it doesn't matter, because you are using tab to type spaces in the end
25 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Wrong Direction

Death row inmates should be used for scientific experiments instead

but
Capital punishment exists to punish crime, not to aid scientific study. Subverting the purpose of execution can create a perverse incentive structure, wherein a need for more scientific study may drive judges to sentence more convicts to death row than they otherwise would.
5 supporter.

Tabs are better than spaces for indentation (programming)

because
Tab width can be adjusted to personal preferences
26 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of Irrelevant Purpose

FFF International should leave Telegram

because
Even easier because it would be clearer
2 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
Other platforms are also easy to join and if it's all in the same place, you need to join only once
2 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

but
I don't find something with groups like Telegram easy to use as you have to be there to follow a discussin. It's almost impossible to read it afterwards
2 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
This means that things are slow and don't get done if everyone does everything. I don't mean to say that not everyone should have a chance to have a say on things but there are better ways of splitting up groups and having those discussions that are open to all 🥰
2 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

but
There is a low barrier of entry to join Telegram
2 supporter.

FFF International should leave Telegram

however
in experience this did not seem to work with discord, so why should it work with another plattform
2 supporter.

If the whole human population spoke one language there would be mutual understanding enlightenment, and peace.

but
even people with the same language fight against each other sometimes (Civil war)
20 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
但是不能忽略案父是直系血親的事實,對個案還有社會責任。並且個案是在發病急性期狀態,所以想法固著、判斷力與衝動控制差,等急性期過與案父關係會逐漸緩和。
2 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
但我們對於個案與案父的過去並不了解,倘諾案父對個案其實不好,如因正方所說個案有思考障礙,判斷能力差,就片面的相信案父所說的話嗎?
2 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

but
但臨床上的護理人員,大多很忙碌,和個案會談的時間短暫,收集的資料有限,若個案防備心重,不願說出事情的事實或是對於病情有所隱瞞,要怎麼評估他是否能出院,故醫療團隊並非"真正"了解個案所有。
2 supporter.

醫療團隊可以決定精神病患是否需要被限制訪客

however
若是因為個案經常與案男友吵架,所以被限制案男友訪視的話,那麼案父不支持個案的想法,與個案爭吵,是不是也是讓個案情緒更不穩定的因素,那是不是也要限制父親?
2 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
Programming tools like IDE's can provide a richer set of supporting features or they are more sophisticated. Mainly regarding refactoring, suggestions, debugging, metrics, detection, prove, inspection, documention, generation, build,...
18 supporter.

You can't measure how good a programming language is.

however
You can if you define what 'good' means.
11 supporter.

There are too much programming languages.

because
It split the community between a lot of different languages, decreasing the resources (documentation, tutorials, class, etc…) for each one of them.
3 supporter.

Semi-colons are pointless in Javascript

but
Rules of Automatic Semicolon Insertion (ASI) are complicated and can lead to subtle errors. Free your mind and raise code standard by inserting semi-colons.
14 supporter.

Tabs are better than spaces for indentation (programming)

because
Tabs are for indentation and spaces are for spacing.
17 supporter.

Gender is NOT a social construct

but
Gender is a social construct. Biological sex is not.
15 supporter.

Tabs are better than spaces for indentation (programming)

but
With current memory capacities the space saved is negligible.
13 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Appeal To Belief

Tabs are better than spaces for indentation (programming)

because
1 click (tabs) vs 4 clicks (spaces) - tab saves time, work, keyboard and your fingers
22 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
Dynamic typed systems need to place guards in hot spot optimizations to ensure that the optimization is running over the correct structure. For example: method foo expects a single argument arg1 which is an Array, but dynamic typed languages can not ensure it will be always like that in the future
10 supporter.

Static typing is better than dynamic typing in programming languages.

because
Static type-checking prevents silly and easy to fix mistakes early enough that could be troublesome to fix in the future.
9 supporter.

You can't measure how good a programming language is.

but
You can still tell whether a language is fit for a particular task
7 supporter.