←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Take a symbolic membership fee for voting rights equal to 20€/year(start ing point) adjusted via ppp similar to gsoc student money .
but
score: 3
Feels very anti-democratic to link voting rights to a fee.
but
score: 1
It wouldn't be linked to only the fee (which is supposed to be symbolic anyway) but to the usual responsibilities and duties that come with voting rights.
0 branch
‒
however
score: 3
Meaningful contribution to the project outside of a fee should be rewarded with voting rights too.
however
score: 1
The voting right is not only linked to the fee but to mainly to the work done. The fee is supposed to be symbolic, as in low enough to not hinder anyone.
0 branch
‒
because
score: 0
All money paid as a membership fee will be tax deductible and we'll be able to e.g. buy conference tickets with it *without paying VAT*
but
score: 1
People could also donate to the nonprofit to get the taxes friendlier
however
score: 1
Tax deductibility is likely going to be ineligible, or difficult, in countries outside the EU unless a local branch is created.
1 branch
‒
however
score: 0
It could be very complicated to collect the money from all the different countries.
but
score: 1
This could be manageable with payoneer which has not too high payment fees
0 branch
‒
because
score: -3
This provides a motivation for inactive members to leave
but
score: 4
A simple cron job (or the human equivalent; every board meeting, for example) to remove inactive people would be enough to maintain a lean member list.
but
score: 1
There is a gray area of people that are kinda active but maybe not enough to keep the maintainer status.
however
score: 1
An automated system shouldn't remove the member, but rather give us a list to start with.
1 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
4 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
adtac
(3 years, 11 months ago)
sims1253
