a
sender
mosky
source
Test Original Discourse
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
Test
Argument
but
score: 1
A
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
because
score: 1
B
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
but
score: 0
C
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
but
score: 1
D
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
0 branch
‒
0 branch
‒
because
score: 1
G
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
because
score: 0
E
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
but
score: 1
F
sender:
mosky
1 year, 5 months ago
permalink
0 branch
‒
3 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
%71.4 support rate
last update:
mosky
(1 year, 5 months ago)
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Argument
is an Evidence
a Nietzchean "will to power" argument can be put forward to explain Freudian "will to pleasure"
Improving our tools to collaboratively debate is of major importance
Arguing on the internet is pointless!
Test argument assertion dogs
Fallacies don't always imply an argument is wrong.
There is no such thing as the self, unless defined specifically as one's body and brain. Such statements as "working on myself" or "controlling myself" are logical fallacies.
Evidentialism makes the fewest possible assumption, and based on the previous argument, is therefore the most reasonable and effective view.
Statement
is a Message
The users tliohottesvirgi, ymcbayrodr & torsethnest should be banned forever and the arguments they created should be deleted
Evidentialism makes the fewest possible assumption, and based on the previous argument, is therefore the most reasonable and effective view.
All disagreements come from poorly formed arguments
Test argument assertion dogs
Your argument is invalid
If you want to base your decision on faith. You can't try support it with rational arguments.
There is no such thing as the self, unless defined specifically as one's body and brain. Such statements as "working on myself" or "controlling myself" are logical fallacies.
Discussion
is a Speech
It's okay to guess or 'brute force' in Words With Friends
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
The more Argüman users are attached to the idea of "being right" more so than to the idea of engaging in rational discourse with an open mind, the less enjoyable this site becomes.
American conservatives should use the word 'terrorist' to describe those who attack Planned Parenthood clinics
argüman should provide a chat or another mean of discussion in order to avoid it in the tree of premises.
Respecting your opposition is a necessity in political discourse, lest a public polarisation occurs and political issues become harder to solve.
Broad claims including the words 'all' or 'none' or the like, are usually false
mosky
mosky