test original discourse
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
The argument have no premises.
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
to add a premise for this argument.
is an Evidence
a Nietzchean "will to power" argument can be put forward to explain Freudian "will to pleasure"
Arguing whether God exists or not is useless to everyone.
Full time minimum wage should be tied to inflation and be no lower than the poverty line.
In argument mapping, there is a difference between but and however.
Your argument is invalid
Arguing on the internet is pointless!
It is essential to list out your arguments
is a Message
If you want to base your decision on faith. You can't try support it with rational arguments.
Darren can win an argument against himself
This argument has the same total count for each premise type (however, but and because).
This is an argument
Ben Shapiro makes a good argument on why Black Lives Matter is wrong
Fallacies don't always imply an argument is wrong.
is a Speech
We are witch hunters not nazis with regards to our treatment of animals
The more Argüman users are attached to the idea of "being right" more so than to the idea of engaging in rational discourse with an open mind, the less enjoyable this site becomes.
Arguman's character limit for a premise is good for discourse
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
Saving our nation with two magical words: socialized prostitution.
Definitions are best kept 'loose'/open in discussions
Broad claims including the words 'all' or 'none' or the like, are usually false