this is a test
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
The argument have no premises.
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
to add a premise for this argument.
is an Evidence
a Nietzchean "will to power" argument can be put forward to explain Freudian "will to pleasure"
This site is not conducive to actual debate or argumentation, since each argument is presented as axiomatic, and each following premise is presented as a modification to the original argument, and not a contradiction.
In Argüman, any 'however' statement could also be a 'but' statement.
Test Argument Post
This statement is false.
Different world lines are possible.
Improving our tools to collaboratively debate is of major importance
is a Message
A monument of the Ten Commandments on the grounds of the Texas state capitol does not violate the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.
Your argument is invalid
Sample Argument for Assignment
argüman should implement meta-argumentation. For example, we need to be able to add arguments in favour of / against the claim that a given argument is a fallacy.
When starting a new argument on argüman for which you have a already a partial opinion, you should instead state the opposite of your proposal.
All these arguments on the website are absolute.
Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.
is a Speech
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
argüman should provide a chat or another mean of discussion in order to avoid it in the tree of premises.
Broad claims including the words 'all' or 'none' or the like, are usually false
The word "continent" is so loosely defined we should stop using it.
American conservatives should use the word 'terrorist' to describe those who attack Planned Parenthood clinics
Respecting your opposition is a necessity in political discourse, lest a public polarisation occurs and political issues become harder to solve.
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.