a
sender
adsfasdfasdfasdf
source
this is a test
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
testing
argument
The argument have no premises.
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Argument
is an Evidence
The users tliohottesvirgi, ymcbayrodr & torsethnest should be banned forever and the arguments they created should be deleted
Every argument boils down to pedantic definitions.
This site is not conducive to actual debate or argumentation, since each argument is presented as axiomatic, and each following premise is presented as a modification to the original argument, and not a contradiction.
"x is better than y" is a flawed form of argument
Arguments should be positive (e.g. contain no 'not')
Evidentialism makes the fewest possible assumption, and based on the previous argument, is therefore the most reasonable and effective view.
Ben Shapiro makes a good argument on why Black Lives Matter is wrong
Statement
is a Message
If you want to base your decision on faith. You can't try support it with rational arguments.
The users tliohottesvirgi, ymcbayrodr & torsethnest should be banned forever and the arguments they created should be deleted
Every argument boils down to pedantic definitions.
All disagreements come from poorly formed arguments
In argument mapping, there is a difference between but and however.
"Argument" should be translated as "论点"
Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.
Discussion
is a Speech
Respecting your opposition is a necessity in political discourse, lest a public polarisation occurs and political issues become harder to solve.
Saving our nation with two magical words: socialized prostitution.
The more Argüman users are attached to the idea of "being right" more so than to the idea of engaging in rational discourse with an open mind, the less enjoyable this site becomes.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
Arguman's character limit for a premise is good for discourse
It's okay to guess or 'brute force' in Words With Friends
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
adsfasdfasdfasdf
adsfasdfasdfasdf