a
/Socialism
sender
donovanspersona
source
Unspecified
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
The Axiom of Objectivism
support
s
Communism
because
score: 2
under capitalism most individuals must work in a system that isn't as good for them as communism. Therefore, if they organize they would kill or displace the boss. If, the boss wants to support their self-interest they would secede to communism.
sender:
donovanspersona
2 years, 9 months ago
1 supporter.
permalink
0 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
%100 support rate
last update:
donovanspersona
(2 years, 9 months ago)
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Affirm
Affirmative Action has brought about positive change for the minorities it serves and for the country as a whole.
Con: Affirmative action
Communism
is a Political Orientation
True communism is better than capitalism, and should be pursued.
Communism is the best ideology for small societies with a transparent allocation of resources
With the increasing robotic automation in the world, it will become necessary to switch to communism to ensure happiness for the largest amount of people.
the first mars colony should try out communism
Global Communism will be achieved in the next century
Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.
Funding
is a Resource
Russian red army is actually funded by US.
It is okay to lie to support your argument
If you want to base your decision on faith. You can't try support it with rational arguments.
NASA funding should constitute at least 1% of the US federal budget.
This website needs a way to support someone who says "Hey, there's a fallacy here!", and a way to say "There's a fallacy here because..."
argüman user base should become completely anonymous to prevent users from sticking only to popular opinions to get more followers and supporters.
The 0.1% of Americans who owns more wealth than the 90% should be trialed for treason/fraud and have their funds taken away
Defend
is an Argue
Research on geo-engineering should be supported financially, globally, and the UN may be the best for doing it
It is okay to lie to support your argument
authority guards knowledge
We have poor educational infrastructure that fails to support lifelong learning.
Loosing one human right makes it harder to maintain others
There must be no communications inaccesible to government agencies that hold a warrant.
This website needs a way to support someone who says "Hey, there's a fallacy here!", and a way to say "There's a fallacy here because..."
Protect
is a Defend
The segregation of students for public education is a violation of the 14th Amendments Equal Protection's Clause
Statute law is the most effective way to protect our rights?
We humans have an obligation to protect the environment.
"Separate but equal" in public education deprives students of the equal protection of the laws guaranteed by the Fourteenth Amendment.
Idaho Code: 15-314 Violates the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment
Segregated school systems violate the equal protection clause under the Fourteenth Amendment.
Oklahoma's 3.2% beer statute violates the 14th Amendment Equal Protection Clause.
Argue
is a Present
People will argue over anything.
You cannot argue against Black-face comedies being prevalent without also arguing against The Big Bang Theory TV series being prevalent too (Which it has been since 2007).
The main reason of the life of every man is sex
Arguman should be used in our SW company to reason about complex topics
Religion is the biggest placebo of all times, for this reason it may be evolutionarily adaptive.
Eating all organic is not reasonable.
Evidentialism makes the fewest possible assumption, and based on the previous argument, is therefore the most reasonable and effective view.
Socialism
is a Political Orientation
Both socialism and capitalism can function as economic systems when employed under adequate circumstances.
Proponents of Socialism or Communism will predominantly argue under bad faith - because there are no compelling arguments but the end goal of access to free money/value subsidizes them in trying to demonize Capitalism relative to Socialism.
Socialism lowers economic inequality
Socialism is preferable to social democracy, and more sustainable than it
Socialism is more effective at poverty reduction and ensuring the meeting of basic needs than capitalism
donovanspersona
