You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
The government should not recognize any form of marriage.
Two or more individuals can create&sign a contract stating the terms of their relationship. If one breaks the contract, the other(s) can sue him.
It should be considered why the government has an interest in controlling marriage in the first place.
If the government is going to recognize marriage, it should not allow divorce without fault. No-fault divorce renders marriage meaningless.
The question of how to divide material possessions after the end of a relationship is usually solved with existing marriage law.
This statement is usually used as a weasel way of opposing same-sex marriage without appearing prejudiced. This severely taints any merit the argument has.
It's ridiculous for the state to give approval of who I love
- 5 branch
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update: corndog