a
sender
spaghetti_tree
source
Unspecified
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
The
word
"continent" is so loosely defined we should stop using it.
The argument have no premises.
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Statement
is a Message
Your argument is invalid
Sample Argument for Assignment
Test argument assertion dogs
Darren can win an argument against himself
Arguments should be positive (e.g. contain no 'not')
This argument has the same total count for each premise type (however, but and because).
Ben Shapiro makes a good argument on why Black Lives Matter is wrong
Intelligence
is an Ability
Gender affects intelligence
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
Intelligent Design is a reasonable hypothesis.
Should we stop developing artificial intelligence
News Media need tighter laws against distorting or falsifying reports.
Intelligent design do not contradict darwinian evolution.
We should stop working on Artificial Intelligence
Word
is a Language Unit
It's okay to guess or 'brute force' in Words With Friends
Sport news does not warrant being reported on the same platform as political issues
News Media need tighter laws against distorting or falsifying reports.
There should be different sets laws for people based on their intelligence.
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
There is a strong correlation between intelligence and humor, suggesting that intelligent people are funnier than those with lower intelligence
Discussion
is a Speech
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
Most of the questions on this site are so vaguely worded as to be undecidable.
Definitions are best kept 'loose'/open in discussions
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
Broad claims including the words 'all' or 'none' or the like, are usually false
spaghetti_tree
spaghetti_tree