a
sender
spaghetti_tree
source
Unspecified
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
←
↑
↓
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
The
word
"continent" is so loosely defined we should stop using it.
The argument have no premises.
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
Neutral support and objection rate.
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.
Statement
is a Message
It is okay to lie to support your argument
argüman should implement meta-argumentation. For example, we need to be able to add arguments in favour of / against the claim that a given argument is a fallacy.
Test Argument Post
In argument mapping, there is a difference between but and however.
Test argument assertion dogs
The monument with the 10 commandments located at the state caputal building does not violate the Establishment Clause of the Constitution.
Test Argument
Intelligence
is an Ability
Gender affects intelligence
In a democracy, voting should be limited to the intelligent, as assessed by a standardized intelligence test.
American conservatives should use the word 'terrorist' to describe those who attack Planned Parenthood clinics
News Media need tighter laws against distorting or falsifying reports.
Should we stop developing artificial intelligence
Most of the questions on this site are so vaguely worded as to be undecidable.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
Word
is a Language Unit
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
argüman should provide a chat or another mean of discussion in order to avoid it in the tree of premises.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
Should we stop developing artificial intelligence
Saving our nation with two magical words: socialized prostitution.
Sport news does not warrant being reported on the same platform as political issues
Discussion
is a Speech
Saving our nation with two magical words: socialized prostitution.
argüman ought to mandate likelihood assignment based on the Kesselman list of estimative words
The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.
Those who create discussions on arguman are not doing so for the sake of discussion but rather as a plea for their beliefs to be heard
Arguman's character limit for a premise is good for discourse
Broad claims including the words 'all' or 'none' or the like, are usually false
Your first Arguman should be a test to understand its usefulness before you apply it to a large discussion topic.
spaghetti_tree
spaghetti_tree