←
↑
→
You can use arrow keys to navigate in the map.
Loading tree...
because
score: 19
the names of logical fallacies are not descriptive enough
however
score: 8
Mouseover text should describe the fallacies, and there should be far more options to choose from.
because
score: 5
The linked wikipedia page does not describe most of the fallacies used here... if any
because
score: 3
Many users are not familiar with the formal names of fallacies; especially in Latin form. They need a description that explains what the name means.
because
score: 2
The wikipedia page is darn bland, lacks example, and lacks fallacies.
however
score: 2
Rather than having to hunt for a fallacy by name, let the user directly type keywords that describe the error in logic; and let Arguman list fallacies that match that description. It is far easier to select a fallacy from the short list. (This is how Bugzilla finds potential duplicate bugs)
because
score: -1
and but's for but's should be counted as because's on the frontage of arguman
but
score: -3
The developers are too lazy to do so.
sources:
Just kidding! :P
1 supporter.
7 branch
‒
×
The argument is too complex. You can switch to list view.
last update:
raindrops
(3 years, 7 months ago)
wholemeal
