a
/Meta
sender
wholemeal
source
Unspecified
RANDOM
RELATED ARGUMENTS
share
view
There should be inbuilt definitions for logical fallacies in arguman
Raindrops
5 years, 1 month ago
however
1 supporter.
Rather than having to hunt for a fallacy by name, let the user directly type keywords that describe the error in logic; and let Arguman list fallacies that match that description. It is far easier to select a fallacy from the short list. (This is how Bugzilla finds potential duplicate bugs)
Raindrops
5 years, 1 month ago
because
2 supporter.
Many users are not familiar with the formal names of fallacies; especially in Latin form. They need a description that explains what the name means.
Cogni
5 years, 4 months ago
because
1
however
4 supporter.
The linked wikipedia page does not describe most of the fallacies used here... if any
rkyeun
5 years, 4 months ago
however
2
because
4 supporter.
Mouseover text should describe the fallacies, and there should be far more options to choose from.
ReligionIsDumb
5 years, 4 months ago
because
and but's for but's should be counted as because's on the frontage of arguman
2 fallacy reported.
Irrelevant Conclusion
wholemeal
5 years, 4 months ago
because
18 supporter.
the names of logical fallacies are not descriptive enough
NTPfun
5 years, 4 months ago
but
1
but
1 supporter.
The developers are too lazy to do so.
sources:
Just kidding! :P
2 fallacy reported.
Wrong Direction
Pruwbb
5 years, 4 months ago
because
1
because
The wikipedia page is darn bland, lacks example, and lacks fallacies.
sources:
Expirience
1 fallacy reported.
Fallacy Of Is To Ought
×
Login
or
register
to add a premise for this argument.