Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

U.S. will bring about the downfall of Mankind

The phrase 'downfall of mankind' is highly subjective. How are we defining it?
4 supporter.

Bush did 9/11

The evidence to the contrary is far more convincing, and far more of it is available. This does not mean that Bush did not take political advantage of 9/11 when it occurred.
3 supporter.

Grammer is a waste of time; you'd understand me irregardless

But that was not an example of bad grammar, it was an example of how adding words changes the meaning of a sentence. Both statements are equally grammatically correct, or incorrect as the case may be.
3 supporter.

Intelligent design do not contradict darwinian evolution.

Almost all proponents of intelligent design heavily criticise Darwinian evolution, and vice versa.
3 supporter.

Everything in the universe is either a potato, or not a potato.

what about hash browns and french fries
2 supporter.

Abortion is a socially accepted kill

The definition of 'murder' is killing a human without justification or excuse, generally with malice aforethought. Neither euthanasia nor abortion meet those qualifications in any way.
2 supporter.

All the problems in the world can be traced back to capitalism

Capitalism in the broader sense, being defined as any economic system that upholds private property, can be said to date back to the dawn of civilization and therefore the start of human problems.
2 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Slothful Induction

Continued automation is incompatible with our current system of Capitalism.

*Nothing* is compatible with our current system of capitalism- the wealthiest classes continue to accumulate wealth at the expense of the workers, and this will either cause a crash when the workers cannot afford basic life supplies, or a revolution.
2 supporter.

Everything in the universe is either a potato, or not a potato.

if something is made with potato and something else though, how do you count it?
2 supporter.

Everything in the universe is either a potato, or not a potato.

The original premise of the argument was that everything is either a potato or not a potato. There is no allowance for "not *just* a potato".
2 supporter.