Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

Logical arguments and critical thinking are NOT generally constructed using "But", "Because", and "However" as objections, reasons or proof, or additional situations.
14 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

The site should cater most to the power users, the ones who actually know this stuff, enjoy it, and delve deep into it. The general user will then follow from there.
9 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

Examples are not formally included in the current Arguman structure and so are often included as premises, rather than in support of premises. There needs to be a better way to include examples and/or evidence as things that support premises - not AS premises themselves.
8 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

Even so, voting can be informative, interesting, meaningful, and, uh, FUN.
3 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Appeal To Belief

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

Arguments should be treated like Wikipedia articles. They need to be improved over time by the community, not just added to. This can be accomplished with the help of a power-user/editor community akin to Wikipedia's.
3 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

This is a great idea and has a shitload of potential. But needs to be done better than this.
3 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

Voting shouldn't determine the truth. This community isn't about voting who is right, it's about developing sound argumentation.
3 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

What we consider "the truth", actually in many cases, IS based on consensus. That's how science works. Sure, to many people, 'voting' has a different connotation, but in a lot of senses, we determine what's true by voting on it.
2 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

There's room for both Facts and Opinions, but they need to be flagged and differentiated. Facts need to be supported with evidence from trusted sources (however the community chooses to define that). Opinions should be differentiated as such.
2 supporter.

Argüman Needs A Serious Redesign/Rethink

A community of verified or at least semi-verified logicians and such could be used to enhance quality and the community, akin to Quora and others.
2 supporter.