The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

The lower courts will know if an action brought against the president is a serious matter or just someone trying to have a day in the light, publicity.

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

Even if civil litigation is allowed to impact the president the risk of it actually interfering with his or her duties is not a serious matter of concern

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

Even if one obtains the presidency and argues there must be separation of powers the Supreme Court has already made it known that they are able to say if the actions taken by the president are lawful.

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

Even though an individual obtains the presidential office they like everyone else who serves the government and its people are not above the law.

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

A designated office and the person in that office are two separate things. When a president functions within his executive duty it is legal outside of that their actions can come into question.

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

immunity does not apply to unofficial conduct. Actions taken that have nothing to do with their official duty aren't subject to immunity.

The Constitution does not grant a sitting President immunity from civil litigation

immunity for public servants is based on making sure officials aren't scared to do their jobs. Meaning if they do something within the confines of their official duty they shouldn't have to worry.