A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

I was only pointing out that a revolution eliminates a particular government, not that eliminating government is a reasonable goal. I support the idea of a limited government that provides justice (mitigation) for citizens whose liberty was abused by other individuals or groups.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

We must also remember that unarmed citizens are much less equal in power than armed citizens. Weapons provide greater equality among a physically diverse population.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

federal and state gun regulation already violates the 2nd amendment, and consider the 9th and 10th amendments which have been ignored in such federal regulation. Would the guns we are allowed to keep be sufficient to successfully revolt against the advanced federal weapons arsenal?

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

many citizens will lack liberty before any successful revolution. This is no limit at all as elimination of that government is required to regain liberty. It allows an oppressive government to exist and results in a long cycle of oppression and revolution.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

The purpose of government may be to allow citizens to limit themselves rather than be limited by the government. A limited government would apply justice after a crime is committed, not by limiting citizens in order to prevent crime before it is committed.

Capitol Punishment is wrong.

perhaps the issue is justice, not punishment. A criminal sentence may serve to approximate a just outcome for the victims, the perpetrator and for society in general. A death sentence, capital punishment, may be the closest approximation to justice for some crimes.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

because poorly worded laws will eventually be used in unintended ways to limit citizen liberty.
2 supporter.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

because corrupt individuals will eventually gain control of the government and limit citizen liberty in order to gain advantage for themselves.
3 supporter.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

because an action of that government will limit citizen liberty and the government will have acquired sufficient power to enforce the limit to liberty.
2 supporter.

A government without limits to its power will eventually limit the liberty of its citizens.

because a citizen will eventually challenge an action of the government causing the government to suppress that challenge by limiting that citizen's liberty.
2 supporter.