CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Premises are scored by how many supporting/opposing premises they have.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Automatic hyperlinking. Mentioning something that shows up in other arguments auto-links it, making it easy to see what the term means.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Double negatives still show up as red. When you say "A, but B" and then "B, but C", C still shows up as red. Shouldn't it be green, in support of A?

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Can't place premises via drag-and-drop; instead premises are moved via a dropdown on the edit screen.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguments can be for or against, but not strongly/weakly for/against.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Not clear how it would interoperate with our existing wiki.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguman looks great and is really easy to use.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguman is open-source; we could host our own version and limit registration to our participants.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguman arguments can't be limited to CDBR participants.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Wiki-style rollback capabilities aren't needed to prevent vandalism if editing controls are robust enough. People can only edit their own arguments, and if they add superfluous arguments those can be reported.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguman lacks wiki-style rollback capabilities.

CDBR should use Arguman for the Psalms Project

Arguman has robust argument mapping capabilities.