Kataquax | Argüman

How should I name my cat?

Entei (like the pokemon)

The users tliohottesvirgi, ymcbayrodr & torsethnest should be banned forever and the arguments they created should be deleted

all of them only create fake arguments that are just the short description of an article they copy-pasted

1 supporter.

It is hypocritical to be pro-life and not an organ donor.

ppl that call themself "pro-life" are refering to the discussion to allow or forbid abortion. this means they are pro life IN THAT SITUATION it does not mean to be pro-life in every situation

The death penalty should be abolished

100 serial killers escape each kills one innocent person => 100 innocent persons suffer

1 fallacy report.

Fallacy Of Red Herring

The death penalty should be abolished

scare others so no one does somethig similar

It is impossible to prove if God exists.

this does not imply that it is impossible to proof god. the creator and ruler could reveal himself as such

1 supporter.

Arguman will fail miserably

the branching and the option to report fallacies do prevent Godwin's Law

Arguman will fail miserably

what does fail mean in this context? when no one uses the side anymore? when the side is taken down? ...?

We do not have free will since everything that happens is determined by what has happened before.

how? like how can quantum effects cause free will?

Although the state often justifies laws based on ethics, the role of the state is not to govern ethically but rather to act within the best interest of the state and its citizens.

your examples are not true in general

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

we can't produce hoverboards because the hoverboard licence is not is not well incorporated into Western culture we can't give hoverboard licences because the hoverboard is not is not well incorporated into Western culture

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

"if you identify as (wo)man you are allowed to use the (wo)man restroom" if that law would exist everyone could say "oh i have to go to the toilet but the one for my sex is upstairs and the other not well time to identify as (wo)man for 5 minutes" and so the restrooms would defacto be unisex

In a democracy, voting should be limited to the intelligent, as assessed by a standardized intelligence test.

what about babys?

1 supporter.

1 fallacy report.

Wrong Direction

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

@zmt it is a "useless differentiation" because it is a differentiation without a use (... what do you expect me to say there? you should rather explain why you think it is right/usefull to treat women differen then men)

all public restrooms should be unirace restrooms (it should be allowed for people to use them regardeless of the skincolor)

it is a useless differentiation

1 supporter.

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

please explain why you think that most women would continue to use a stall

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

most women do not use a female urination device because most women don't have the opportunity to use them since pissoirs are (mostly) only in the male bathroom

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

on a unisex bathroom women could be as fast as men if they use the pissoir with a urination device

all public restrooms should be unisex restrooms

but this is only because they use the pissoir (or abuse the normal toilet as one) (if not i would need a source to belive that)and they can still do this on unisex bathrooms