Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

Cannibalism is inherently wrong.

There is nothing immoral about it as long as you respect the wishes of the person being eaten and haven't committed any other acts such as murder at which point murder would be the issue not the cannibalism
8 supporter.

All foods besides vitamins and calorie-dense paste should be abolished

You're restricting peoples free will
3 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Appeal To Belief

Dota 2 is a superior eSport to League of Legends

League of Legends is lacking basic features to enable it as a competitive game even though many of these were promised many years ago, such as: * Voice chat * Sandbox * Equal footing between players (depending only on skill) * A working client * A replay and or rollback system
3 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of Red Herring

You can prevent three people from dying if you kill one yourself. This would be the morally correct choice to make

You would be killing someone who initially wouldn't be involved. Imagine 3 people were on the train tracks, you're by a lever which will change the trains direction so it hits one person who was just crossing. This is hypothetical of course, so we imagine that you're certain the 1 would die
2 supporter.

All foods besides vitamins and calorie-dense paste should be abolished

It would also cause a huge number of health issues as you wouldn't receive a well balanced diet
2 supporter.

The word of someone can't be considered as a proof.

You have to give someone's word a certain amount of trust, otherwise the world wouldn't function as it does
2 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Irrelevant Conclusion

Political Correctness has gone too far and threatens society

You can also give statistics on the number of black criminals compared to white as well as statistics on peoples position in society dependent on skin color (black people tend to have less money). This shows that black people worse off but people quoting these statistics are often called racists
1 supporter.

You can prevent three people from dying if you kill one yourself. This would be the morally correct choice to make

This is hypothetical, a question on morality. Point is mute
1 supporter.

Free will is a lie.

There is no such thing as "random", but any slight change in a variable causes a vastly different result (chaos theory), which is why we as people and not supernatural beings cannot predict the future
1 supporter.

Balloons serve no functional purpose and should be banned.

They cost resources. Few things serve no functional purpose so your reasoning is false anyway.
1 supporter.