Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

If you contest the rule and distrust the admin, how do you propose to decide the case-by-case decision making that you propose for the gestion of rules? some democratic vote? 3 guys arguing on arguman? You propose no real alternative to legalism.

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

"have an even more final say". Why?

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

"winning"? also don't know if it's possible to copy-paste a link in such posts

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

there was a consensus, not because of a poll, but because there was public rules, that none were supposed to ignore them, and that there wasn't protests on them, thus tacit approval.

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

Do you mean: "we should allow Portugal to do so in this situation" or,"the rules should be changed to allow countries in such situation to do so"? and if so, what exact change do you propose?

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

I'd say there *are* legitimate because they were accepted (tacitely or explicitely) by the community.
1 supporter.

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

Last campaign is completely irrelevant to this campaign and the rules that apply to it or are broken here.

Portugal should not be allowed to move to the new world like that.

We are in a situation were the admins are judge, jury and executionner, and even submitting it to the community is asking to people involved in the situation (in)directly. To avoid any conflict of interest we should stick the most closely possible to the rules as defined at the start of the campaign
1 supporter.