The rich will always get richer, and the poor poorer.

This was not the case for the majority of human history

Wrong Direction

It's about wealth (money and possesions) not quality of life)

"Collective action" through a "democratic process" often produces a result which excludes the needs of minorities.

Pure democracy is a form of dictatorship, where the majority is the dictator.

Begging The Question

Link doesn't confirm this premise because it doesn't match the definition.

Fascist thought should be banned, and prominent proponents of fascism imprisoned as a deterrent

Communism has directly lead to more innocent deaths than Fascism. Therefore we should embrace Fascism whenever it will save us from Communism. Banning Fascism might cause far greater harm. By your own logic we should embrace Fascism.

Wrong Direction

Brought communism into the equation without real evidence and reason as to why this connects to the previous premise.

Fascist thought should be banned, and prominent proponents of fascism imprisoned as a deterrent

Communism has directly lead to more innocent deaths than Fascism. Therefore we should embrace Fascism whenever it will save us from Communism. Banning Fascism might cause far greater harm. By your own logic we should embrace Fascism.

Begging The Question

"we should embrace Fascism whenever it will save us from Communism" - Who said that fascism could save a country from communism? It begs the obvious "how so?" question.

Hitler Wasn't THAT Bad.

He killed Hitler.

Irrelevant Conclusion

irrelevant joke.

From an evolutionary standpoint, homosexuality is an unfavorable trait.

From a historical societal standpoint, it is also undesirable. Which begs the question: From what group standpoint is homosexuality desirable? I request a group standpoint because from individual standpoints, any number of arguments can be made regarding any topic.

Irrelevant Conclusion

If it is additionally undesirable doesn't add to the discussion whether it is evolutionary unfavorable.

Donald Trump is a racist

Its true but trival. If you define you premise down to the wire then there is no argument. You premise defines the conclusion

Begging The Question

My premise defines the parameters of the discussion, not any conclusion.

Donald Trump is a racist

People like him and his (racist?) views. Hence : you might as well call everyone racist

Irrelevant Conclusion

Irrelevant.

Muslims should not be able to enter the United States

Americans should not be allowed to exit the United States. This way, US economy crashes and muslim (plus europeans, russians, chinese, latin americans, etc...) people are safe again.

Wrong Direction

Troll answer.

The rise of conservatism and reactionarism is caused by political ignorance.

Who gives a shit to today's economists. They know shit about economy. It abhors me to read Piketty's "solutions" to 2008/9 crisis, it is really a hopeless field of study. It's like 1900 all over again.

Prejudicial Language

You try to undermine economists by simply stating "Who gives a shit about them"

There should be a minimum age for joining any organized religion, where children are not allowed.

May I ask why?

Wrong Direction

Asking for arguments is the whole point of this website. The green and red arguments are the response to your question.

Women should rule the world.

So far we have tried the other way and our world sucks.

Begging The Question

"Since with the current system it sucks, that must mean the opposite must not suck!"

Women should rule the world.

However, women are more likely to adopt this problem-solving philosophy. Therefore, men should make an extra effort to include women in decision-making efforts.

Begging The Question

Substantial citation needed.

There should be a minimum age for joining any organized religion, where children are not allowed.

the choice to become religious demands a certain level of introspection and consciousness, something that is hard to demand from a child. The choice to become religious is personal, and not something one is forced into by for example parents.

Irrelevant Conclusion

You brought "forcing" into the argument without me using it. FORCING a child to do most activities is mostly child abuse anyway so it's irrelevant to the discussion.

Ethnic diversity reduces social solidarity and diminishes social capital

Ethnic diversity reduces concern for the environment.

Slothful Induction

Your own citation disagrees with you.

Schools should be required to present creation as a theory alongside evolution, since neither can be proven superior over the other by science

There are creationists that exist who mix science with their religion. Some believe that the universe is actually 13.8 billion years old and that god did use evolution to create. They interpret their religious texts and certain word usages to support scientific findings.

Irrelevant Conclusion

That is called theistic evolution and a) has no basis to prove it and b) is irrelevant since it's technically not creationism.