Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

a) Jesus Christ was a real person; b) Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

The claim that Jesus rose from the dead is an extraordinary claim. To substantiate this claim, we must be supplied with extraordinary evidence. We have not been supplied with extraordinary evidence.
7 supporter.

Making the world a better place doesn't matter.

The fact that the world will end in billions of years is irrelevant to individual humans who only live for a few decades and who's well-being can be improved by our efforts to "make the world a better place".
6 supporter.

a) Jesus Christ was a real person; b) Jesus Christ rose from the dead.

The only evidence that has been supplied is the account provided by the Gospel scriptures. This is not sufficient evidence to accept such an extraordinary claim. There exist no contemporaneous accounts that specifically corroborate the resurrection story.
5 supporter.

Making the world a better place doesn't matter.

The existence of individuals who are destroying the world is not a reason for other people to give up on trying to improve the world. In fact, the existence of individuals who are destroying the world is one of the primary reasons for trying to improve the world.
5 supporter.

Anime is autistic. (In the same sense that minecon is)

Autism is a neurodevelopmental disorder attributed to humans and neither 'Anime' nor 'MineCon' are humans.
4 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Wrong Direction

a vegan diet is the most ethically viable

Accepting that "everyone defines his/her own ethics" does not preclude a discussion about which ethical precepts and values are more reasonable.
3 supporter.

There is no life after death

Evidence from neurology points towards consciousness being purely a process that is carried out by the brain. There is no good reason to suppose that consciousness can survive the destruction of the brain at death.
3 supporter.

9/11 was an inside job.

If we assume that the motive for this alleged "inside-job" would be to justify aggressive foreign policy, it would have been sufficient to just fly the planes into the buildings. It would still have been horrific even if the buildings didn't collapse.
2 supporter.

Taking a life in order to save a thousand lives is morally and ethically acceptable

body count is not the only factor to consider. There are other consequences.
2 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Begging The Question

Taking a life in order to save a thousand lives is morally and ethically acceptable

peoples' happiness and sanity can be affected by the knowledge that an individual was deliberately killed for the purpose of saving others.
2 supporter.