Most active channels

Most discussed users

Most supported premises

Democracy is flawed.

When the masses are controlled through public persuasion and media the one distinction from fascism is the fact that the population is unaware of the manipulation.
5 supporter.

Democracy is flawed.

Contemporary democracy opens up for discrimination of minorities when practiced on a national and non - syndicalized structure since the majority decides even in cases related to the minority.
3 supporter.

If the whole human population spoke one language there would be mutual understanding enlightenment, and peace.

Even within one language today we see racism. We also find murder, rape, torture etc. amongst communities who speak the same language. (usa for the racism example or french in regards to former french colonies)
2 supporter.

Free will (the existence of autonomous human decisions made neither predictably nor randomly) is not real.

This requires the belief in free will to start off with. The whole question is wether it exists or not. By stating we have a term for it does not prove its existence
1 supporter.

An algorithmic government would be fairer and more efficient than what we have now.

Using humans as an example of AI would presume that another AI derived from algorithms would function the same way as the biological counterpart.
1 supporter.

This argument has the same total count for each premise type (however, but and because).

Just like me, we are proving that we can keep it in a certain stage
1 supporter.

Time is not linear.

This is only through the perception of humans. This does not mean that entropy cant happen backwards, only that we cant perceive it.
1 supporter.

Without a police force there is no government

There can be other means of enforcment (if this is the assumed role of the government) beyond physical, such as monetary restrictions or ostracization.
1 supporter.