a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • 🇳🇴 Nodic (english) Standards 🇵🇱 Polish Español France 🇫🇷 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • zukonake
  • ZukoNake
  • twitter
    @ZukoNake
  • date joined
    Oct. 13, 2015

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

The right to bear arms should be restricted.

If anyone would be really aggresive and unstable, he could as well stab someone with a knife.

All religion should be abolished

Even if science is more reliable source of knowledge, you can't force everyone to think the same way. Beside that, many people can't understand science and this is why religion exists.
2 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of False Cause
Fallacy Of Slippery Slope

The right to bear arms should be restricted.

Many children simply took the guns from their parents.
2 supporter.

The right to bear arms should be restricted.

300 dead people is not a reason to forbid guns for the rest of the population.

The right to bear arms should be restricted.

The citizens in the country will lose their ability to oppose the government and will also not be able to defend the country when the military fails.

The death penalty is wrong.

It's still all up to how the money is spent, the data from the source you have linked, show us how uneffiecent the money is spent during death penalty trials and how it needs a change. Seems like death penalty is more expensive but it could be actually cheaper if done properly.
2 fallacy report.
Fallacy Of Is To Ought
Irrelevant Conclusion

The death penalty is wrong.

It depends on how the prisoner is killed. There are many cheap ways.
1 supporter.

The death penalty is wrong.

Prisoners senteced to longer sentences should not be kept by taxers' money. It's cheaper to sentence them to death.
1 supporter.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback