Having a one world order would actually be beneficial.

Jeremiah 10:23 says human governments cannot rule the world. Daniel 2:44 says God will bring out just one government that will be successful indefinitely.

Fallacy Of Red Herring

Argument from authority: Bible is an authority on a particular topic. Bible says something about that topic. Bible is probably correct.

Having a one world order would actually be beneficial.

A world order that promoted worldwide/universal togetherness could be nothing but beneficial for all of humanity, but one that encouraged slaughter and *total* anarchy would be destructive.

Begging The Question

Only two possible outcomes? How about a decentralized "world order" where people could decide how they organize matters in their living environment(s)? Besides, anarchy means nothing but non-existence of power hiearchy and centralized control. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anarchy