a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • English Polski Español Français 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • blj218
  • date joined
    Feb. 13, 2018

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Fallacy Reports

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

If is dangerous for Google to tinker with their algorithm just because of these results. If they start doing this, it opens up a whole new and probably never ending problem. There could be "errors" on every single search result.

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

There needs to be a difference between ethical/true and valid. While many may disagree with the ethical association of the search result, the algorithm is not making a mistake, it is only working with the data it has access to.

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

There needs to be a difference between ethical/true and valid. While many may disagree with the ethical association of the search result, the algorithm is not making a mistake, it is only working with the data it has access to.

Google returning a page about “abortion” to a search for “murder” is valid.

The use of Google Bombing makes the result invalid, it does not come from accurate data or searches, instead it is an intentional attempt to "beat the system"

XYZ Corp should implement their health monitoring program.

Just because some companies are already using methods like this does not mean it's ethical

XYZ Corp should implement their health monitoring program.

Something like this should not be enforced or considered mandatory. Personal conditions could be embarrassing to disclose and could lead to discrimination

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback