a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • 🇳🇴 Nodic (english) Standards 🇵🇱 Polish Español France 🇫🇷 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • fiatjaf
  • date joined
    Oct. 17, 2015

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

Most active channels

  • Life
  • Religion
  • Science
  • Economy
  • Universe
  • Artificial Intelligence

Most discussed users

  • skissor
  • shaftstroker
  • kronecker
  • rasmus_dyhr
  • malloryerik

Most supported premises

A creator must exist

You can't really describe the universe. You are only supposing it will be possible someday, but no one has, to this day, actually achieved a total description.
5 supporter.

the Earth is not moving

There's no empirical proof that Earth is in fact moving, there's only a model of the universe that "explains better" the empirical data we have about movements of planets and stars. But nothing prevents this data we have from being explained in terms of a static Earth.
2 supporter.

the Earth is not moving

no one can state that the Earth is moving, for the same reason no one could state that it was static in the past, or that no one could state that the Sun is static today, or that our galaxy has a static center. Everything is a difference of perspective.
2 supporter.

A creator must exist

Let me clarify it: I'm not saying that "there is a God and He is perfect". I'm rather saying that there must exist something we can call "perfect". That thing must be omnipotent and omnipresent, and It is God.
2 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Appeal To Belief

A universal basic income is the best way to eradicate economic inequality.

It is politically impossible to remove the "convoluted, bureaucratic collection of welfare programmes we currently have in place", so proposing universal income is just proposing another welfare programme in addition to these others.
1 supporter.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback