a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • English Polski Español Français 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • ilkali
  • date joined
    Oct. 19, 2015

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Fallacy Reports

Schools should be required to present creation as a theory alongside evolution, since neither can be proven superior over the other by science

This premise uses the same argument as theory of evolution. The only difference between them is one says God created everything and other doesn't say anything about it.
2 supporter.

Astrology is not a science

This proposition depends on your viewpoint to what is science therefore it brings us to problem of demarcation. If we look at this problem from Thagards viewpoint we can claim astrology as pseudoscience.
2 supporter.

Creationism is a scientific doctrine

Evolution is a scientific premise because it is falsifiable. There are possible observations that would prove our understanding of evolution obsolete, such as a human fossil from the same age with dinosaurs, or a million year old humanoid fossil with same DNA as modern human.
4 supporter.

Creationism is a scientific doctrine

Being disagreed or falsified doesnt make a scientific preposition any less scientific. A preposition is either scientific or not, that doesn't depent on its degree of truth. Therefore creationism can be scientific even if it is widely regarded as false.
1 supporter.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback