a
  • about
  • blog
  • register
  • login

  • en 🇳🇴 English Polski Español Français 中文 (Chinese Simplified) Türkçe
  • Jay Bienvenu
  • jbnv
  • twitter
    @jbnv
  • date joined
    Oct. 14, 2015

Following (0)

Followers (0)

  • Overview
  • Premises
  • Arguments
  • Fallacy Reports

Most active channels

  • Politics
  • Science
  • Evolution
  • Death
  • Religion
  • People

Most discussed users

  • paintbuck3t
  • vrazcernik
  • dad
  • kbeaumont152
  • matrixrunner

Most supported premises

The government should not recognize any form of marriage.

The state doesn’t care if the parties love each other. There are no questions about a couple’s affections when granting a license. No proof of passion is required.
6 supporter.

We should limit service in Congress to one term per person.

This will result in the constant churn of the membership of Congress, bringing in fresh ideas and people who are elected to solve current problems. It will destroy the power structure currently existing via seniority. It will prevent Congress from being a career option.
2 supporter.

The government should not recognize any form of marriage.

Two or more individuals can create&sign a contract stating the terms of their relationship. If one breaks the contract, the other(s) can sue him.
2 supporter.

Teaching evolution in public schools should be mandatory

Who decides what material is "mandatory" and must be taught?
1 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Irrelevant Conclusion

The government should not recognize any form of marriage.

If the government is going to recognize marriage, it should not allow divorce without fault. No-fault divorce renders marriage meaningless.
1 supporter.

arguman is an open-source project.

Terms of Service | Feedback