a
about
blog
register
login
en
🇳🇴
English
Polski
Español
Français
中文 (Chinese Simplified)
Türkçe
Overview
Premises
Arguments
Fallacy Reports
Most active channels
Politics
Science
Evolution
Death
Religion
People
Most discussed users
paintbuck3t
vrazcernik
dad
kbeaumont152
matrixrunner
Most supported premises
The government should not recognize any form of marriage.
The state doesn’t care if the parties love each other. There are no questions about a couple’s affections when granting a license. No proof of passion is required.
6 supporter.
We should limit service in Congress to one term per person.
This will result in the constant churn of the membership of Congress, bringing in fresh ideas and people who are elected to solve current problems. It will destroy the power structure currently existing via seniority. It will prevent Congress from being a career option.
2 supporter.
The government should not recognize any form of marriage.
Two or more individuals can create&sign a contract stating the terms of their relationship. If one breaks the contract, the other(s) can sue him.
2 supporter.
Teaching evolution in public schools should be mandatory
Who decides what material is "mandatory" and must be taught?
1 supporter.
1 fallacy report.
Irrelevant Conclusion
The government should not recognize any form of marriage.
If the government is going to recognize marriage, it should not allow divorce without fault. No-fault divorce renders marriage meaningless.
1 supporter.